[ad_1]
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loongs’s remarks on India in a speech in Parliament earlier this month precipitated a stir between the 2 international locations that usually get pleasure from pleasant relations.
India’s Ministry of Exterior Affairs conveyed to Singapore’s Excessive Commissioner Simon Wong that “remarks by the Prime Minister of Singapore (about India) have been uncalled for”.
Nevertheless, over every week since PM Lee’s feedback, there are people who find themselves nonetheless responding to them.
In a letter revealed within the South China Morning Submit on Feb 26, one netizen wrote, “Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong would do properly to maintain his deal with his personal nation. India is a powerful and vibrant democracy, not like Singapore which has been led by nearly one get together since 1959 with a really small opposition.”
In his prolonged Feb 15 speech throughout the debate on the Committee of Privileges’ report within the wake of the Raeesah Khan scandal, PM Lee praised India’s founding Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, amongst different nationwide leaders.
Nevertheless, compared to “Nehru’s India”, PM Lee mentioned that at present “in response to media studies, virtually half the MPs within the Lok Sabha [India’s lower house of Parliament] have felony fees pending towards them, together with fees of rape and homicide.
Although it’s also mentioned that many of those allegations are politically motivated.”
His remarks precipitated an outcry in India, which is uncommon, as India and Singapore are strategic companions within the area.
SCMP revealed a letter from a Deepak Mirchandani on Feb 26 in response to a Feb 18 article on the positioning titled “Why Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong’s Nehru feedback hit a uncooked nerve in India.”
Mr Mirchandani wrote that he took problem with one a part of the article that talked about the place Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister, was educated.
– Commercial 2-
“No person, besides the Congress get together elite, cares,” he mentioned, including that an argument might be made that Nehru’s “elitist schooling alienated him from India’s lots.”
He added that as extra Indians have come to acknowledge that Nehru’s financial insurance policies had not strengthened the nation’s standing worldwide, the “adulation that he as soon as loved” and that PM Lee had echoed, “has diminished.”
Mr Mirchandani additionally praised India’s present Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, writing that Nehru isn’t the one chief with the attitude that minorities are an integral a part of the nation “and that communalism in any type is deplorable.”
Mr Modi’s slogan is “‘Sabka sath, sabka vikas, sabka vishwas’ (Along with everybody, improvement for all, the belief of all),” he added.
“Throughout his tenure, Modi has largely achieved a excessive annual financial progress fee, invested in infrastructure, and made efforts to stamp out corruption,” wrote Mr Mirchandani. /TISG
PM Lee ‘speaking via his hat!’ — Outraged Indian commentators slam Singapore PM’s ‘uncalled-for’ comment on India
– Commercial 3-
Observe us on Social Media
Ship in your scoops to information@theindependent.sg
[ad_2]
Source link
