[ad_1]
Final week, an opinion piece revealed on this web site made an insightful analogy between actor, Will Smith’s now notorious slap and the Singapore’s ruling Peoples’ Motion Celebration (PAP) Authorities. In his observations, author, Tang Li famous that the Oscars had been declining in viewership however Smith’s well-timed, albeit ill-advised slap boosted viewership numbers.
In different phrases “dangerous issues and a**eholes have a job to play within the scheme of issues. When one is driving excessive on success, one can are inclined to get complacent. As a substitute of continually searching for enchancment, one will get snug with previous successes and spends time working away from new challenges, thereby resulting in stagnation.
Within the context of the PAP Authorities, the main target has been to make sure “our greatest and brightest by no means face a severe problem, thereby making certain the very best brains rot in a deluded cloud of self-entitlement (“I’m profitable” due to one thing I did 20-years in the past, not as a result of I’m always working at it”).”
There have been many examples of this enjoying out in recent times. For instance, the Authorities’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic has been criticised as “reactionary” relatively than proactive or visionary. And until today, the promised evaluate of how the Authorities handled Covid-19 on the “proper time” has nonetheless not materialised.
Has the 4G management discovered themselves ready whereby they’d inherited a popularity of competence with out essentially having confirmed the identical in their very own proper?
Not too long ago, Minister for Finance, Lawrence Wong, was accused of being “out of contact” by netizens over his refusal to scale back or droop gas duties or to supply highway tax rebates regardless of the rising prices of dwelling that have an effect on many Singaporeans.
“It appears he misplaced contact with individuals on the road. What about individuals who drive taxis, phv [private hire vehicle drivers] or deliveries (sic) drivers? Are they higher off group? These individuals have misplaced each day taking of $50 or extra after petrol value gone up. On prime of this, each day meals value have (sic) additionally gone up”.
Are the 4G management educated to have a look at the nation with recent eyes? Or are they merely trotting out drained and unimaginative options to issues they don’t perceive as a result of the system is geared to guard them from truly going through the baptism of fireside that makes nice leaders?
It could even be that lots of our nationwide establishments face the same downside. Allow us to take a look at The Straits Occasions (ST). The ST has lengthy had the popularity of being a mouthpiece of the Authorities with a pro- PAP slant. Its journalistic integrity and the standard of its reporting have been criticised for being one-sided and lazy.
Now that the ST is not a for-profit firm however a publicly funded establishment that needs to be rightly accountable to the general public, has something modified?
In February this 12 months, the ST’s print version omitted a couple of paragraphs from a Reuters report which included that the Singapore Authorities could have been one of many early prospects of Quadream, an Israeli surveillance firm. Contemplating the gross intrusion of privateness, this could have been the crux of the story which any information outlet value its salt would wish to spotlight. The truth that the nationwide paper would omit this reality is curious. Is that this symptomatic of a whole system working in live performance to guard these in energy from ever having to cope with the implications of its actions?
Not too long ago, an ST reader criticised the paper’s protection of a “racist-islamophobic assault” for seemingly prioritising the narrative of the attacker over the narrative of the victims of the assault. Whereas this will have been an oversight, one does surprise if the oversight would have occurred had the paper been in a much less protectionist system.
Simply over a 12 months in the past, then CEO of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), Ng Yat Chung got here underneath hearth for unprofessionally shedding his cool when requested a completely affordable query in relation as to whether or not the SPH restructuring would end in a “pivot to emphasize editorial integrity, for instance, forward of advertiser pursuits”.
Ng’s outburst displayed surprising entitlement – virtually as if he couldn’t consider that state-affiliated establishments ought to ever be topic to any questioning. Has our system grow to be so molly-coddled that even asking an affordable query may result in such a disproportionate response from the CEO?
In focusing a lot on pretending that it is aware of all by way of its “ownself examine ownself” system, has our Authorities and establishments grow to be completely unable to face challenges? Are we losing alternatives and assets by crushing questions as an alternative of studying by way of going through challenges head-on? The truth that classes might be realized from errors isn’t a brand new idea. But, our Authorities and its establishments could by no means profit from such classes whether it is structured in such a “head buried within the sand” manner.
The concept “we’re so intelligent that we will by no means make errors” is a man-made and wholly unrealistic one. It is usually counterproductive and we’re the poorer for it. /TISG
The submit Are our Authorities and its establishments stagnating attributable to being molly-coddled in our protectionist system? appeared first on The Unbiased Singapore Information – Newest Breaking Information
[ad_2]
Source link
