[ad_1]
The court-appointed staff, which performed the survey on the Shringar Gauri temple-Gyanvapi mosque complicated, will submit the report earlier than a Varanasi courtroom on Tuesday because the listening to will resume.
After listening to inconclusive arguments from the 2 sides, Varanasi’s Civil Decide (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar listed the matter for additional listening to on Tuesday. Decide Diwakar had ordered the survey earlier on a plea by 5 Delghi ladies looking for the courtroom’s permission to carry out each day worships of idols of some deities positioned on the western wall of the mosque.
In the meantime, the mesmerizing Taj Mahal – India’s solely ever monument that was chosen as one of many seven Wonders of the World – is in the midst of Hindu spiritual scrutiny after a petition was filed earlier than the Allahabad Excessive Court docket to open 20 rooms inside it to seek out if “Hindu idols and inscriptions are hidden there.”
Right here’s a wrap up of each the controversies
Shringar Gauri temple-Gyanvapi mosque
In 1991, a bunch of petitions have been filed in Varanasi district courtroom by native clergymen looking for permission to worship within the Gyanvapi complicated. The petitioners claimed that the Gyanvapi Masjid was constructed on the orders of Mughal ruler Aurangzeb by demolishing part of the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir within the seventeenth century.
Minimize to 2019, petitioners demanded that an archaeological survey of the whole Gyanvapi mosque complicated needs to be performed.
Two years later, in September 2021, the Allahabad Excessive Court docket stayed the archaeological survey of ASI in Gyanvapi Masjid.
Within the newest row, 5 Delhi-based ladies — Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others moved the courtroom with their plea on April 18, 2021 demanding that opponents cease “inflicting any harm to the idols” and proper to worship the idols of Shringar Gauri and different deities within the mosque premises every day have to be secured.
On Monday, the mosque administration committee, represented by advocate Abhay Nath Yadav, has approached the courtroom for the appointment of one other advocate because the courtroom commissioner, accusing the current one among favouring Hindu petitioners in his court-mandated process. Court docket commissioner Mishra and attorneys representing each the Hindu and Muslim sides had on Saturday gone contained in the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri temple complicated.
Regardless of spending almost two hours contained in the complicated, they’d not been capable of accomplish the work and needed to come out of the complicated. Counsel Vishnu Jain, representing the 5 Delhi ladies, too had gone contained in the complicated with Mishra on Saturday.
After rising from there, he had informed reporters that males current contained in the mosque didn’t permit the survey staff to enter the mosque space to do the survey. He had additionally accused the district administration of not serving to the courtroom commissioner’s staff in getting into the mosque. Jain had mentioned they’d apprise the courtroom on Monday of the opposition to the court-mandated process of the mosque complicated and search a selected order to hold out the videography and survey of the Gyanvapi mosque.
The videographic survey of the mosque was ordered earlier by Decide Diwakar on a plea by Delhi ladies Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others looking for permission to carry out each day worship of deities Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi whose idols are positioned on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque. They’d moved the courtroom with their plea on April 18, 2021, and had additionally sought the courtroom’s order to cease the opponents from inflicting any harm to the idols.
The counsel for the mosque administration committee (Anjuman Intezamiya Masajid), Yadav had earlier contended that the courtroom had not given any order to do the videography contained in the mosque however to do it solely until the ‘chabutra’ (courtyard) exterior the barricades enclosing the mosque space. The courtroom commissioner had on Friday performed an inclonclusive survey of some areas exterior Gyanvapi Masjid within the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri complicated amid transient sloganeering by two sides.
4 Petitioners Reject Report They Plan to Withdraw Plea
4 of the 5 petitioners within the Gyanvapi mosque-Shringar Gauri temple case Sunday dismissed reviews that they plan to withdraw the plea. The 4 ladies — Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas, Rekha Pathak and Laxmi Devi informed a press convention right here they are going to battle the case until the tip.
This comes after chief of Vishwa Vaidik Sanatan Sangh Jitendra Singh Bisen mentioned his NGO, which backed the unique plea filed by the 5 ladies, has now sought the withdrawal of the petition that demanded permission for each day worship and performing Hindu rituals at Shringar Gauri temple, One of many 4 ladies petitioners informed the presser, “If any kind of resolution (concerning the withdrawal of the case) is taken, we’re in opposition to it. We’ll battle the case to the final breath. We’ll proceed our battle for our Gods and Goddesses. Nevertheless, the fifth petitioner within the case Rakhi Singh was not current on the press convention.
Rekha Pathak mentioned, “A few days in the past, I had spoken to Rakhi Singh, however there was no dialogue concerning withdrawal of the case.” When contacted, Jitendra Singh Bisen refused to touch upon the matter. The petitioners have sought the permission to carry out each day worship of deities Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi whose idols are on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque.
Court docket Crew Visits Gyanvapi Mosque-Shringar Gauri Temple Complicated, Fails to Do Survey
A courtroom commissioner’s staff on Saturday visited the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri temple complicated right here and stayed there for over two hours however didn’t conduct a videographic-survey of the mosque attributable to protest by Muslim males. The Muslims protested in opposition to the survey even because the mosque administration committee moved a Varanasi district courtroom looking for the appointment of a special courtroom commissioner, apart from the current one, Ajay Kumar Mishra.
After listening to the plea this morning to alter the courtroom commissioner, Varanasi’s Civil Decide (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar reserved his order for Could 9. Court docket-appointed commissioner Mishra together with attorneys representing each the Hindu and Muslim sides went contained in the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri temple complicated. However, after spending almost two hours contained in the complicated, they got here out with out engaging in the duty.
Vishnu Jain, a lawyer from the Hindu facet who had gone contained in the complicated with the surveyor informed reporters that Muslim males current within the mosque didn’t permit the staff to enter the mosque space for its videography and survey as per the courtroom’s order. He alleged that the district administration didn’t assist both the survey staff do its job.
Jain mentioned they’d inform the courtroom on Could 9 concerning the matter and would ask for particular order to hold out the videography and survey of the Gyanvapi mosque. Police earlier held a Muslim man elevating spiritual slogans when the survey staff was getting into the mosque-temple complicated and whisked him to a police station.
The videography and survey train is being executed on the identical courtroom’s earlier order on a plea by Delhi-based ladies Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu and others looking for permission for performing each day worship of deities Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Lord Hanuman and Nandi positioned whose idols are positioned on the outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque. They’d moved the courtroom with their plea on April 18, 2021 and had sought to cease the opponents from inflicting any harm to the idols.
The counsel for the mosque administration committee (Anjuman Intezamiya Masajid), Abhay Nath Yadav informed reporters that the courtroom had not given any order to do the videography contained in the mosque however to do it until the ‘chabutra’ (courtyard) exterior the barricading. Yadav mentioned, “The videography and survey began at round 4.00 pm Yesterday and the videography was executed until the ‘chabutra’ on the western facet of the mosque. “After that, when the commissioner made an effort to go contained in the mosque by getting its entrance door opened, I opposed it, stating that the courtroom has not given any such order below which videography will be executed contained in the mosque,” he mentioned.
“The court-appointed commissioner claimed he has the orders to open the locks and get videography executed. However, the reality is that there isn’t any such order like this, therefore I raised questions on the impartiality of the courtroom commissioner,” Yadav mentioned. Litigant associates of the Hindu facet Vijay Shankar Rastogi mentioned, “The courtroom whereas listening to the plea looking for to alter the courtroom commissioner, has reserved its order.” “The court-appointed commissioner is discharging his accountability with honesty. An software was moved on behalf of the Anjuman Intezamiya Masajid Committee to create hurdles for him, accusing him of colluding with petitioners,” he added.
Rastogi additionally mentioned the survey will happen because the courtroom has not put any type of ban on it. The courtroom commissioner had on Friday performed a videographic survey of some areas exterior Gyanvapi Masjid within the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri complicated.
Petition in Allahabad HC to open 20 rooms in Taj Mahal
A petition has been filed within the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad excessive courtroom looking for directives to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to open 20 rooms contained in the Taj Mahal in Agra to establish whether or not the Hindu idols and inscriptions are hidden there.
Bharatiya Janata Social gathering (BJP) media in-charge of Ayodhya district, Dr Rajneesh Singh has filed the petition which is but to come back up for listening to.
Advocate Rudra Vikram Singh is representing the petitioner in courtroom.
“There may be an outdated controversy associated to the Taj Mahal. Round 20 rooms in Taj Mahal are locked and nobody is allowed to enter. It’s believed that in these rooms there are idols of Hindu gods and scriptures,” mentioned Dr Rajneesh Singh.
“I’ve filed a petition within the excessive courtroom looking for directives to ASI to open these rooms to establish info. There isn’t any hurt in opening these rooms and setting to relaxation all controversies,” mentioned Singh on Sunday.
Within the plea, the petitioner has sought directives from the courtroom to the state authorities to represent a committee that will study these rooms and search for any proof associated with the Hindu idols or scriptures there.
Rajneesh Singh mentioned he has been attempting to establish info concerning the 20 locked rooms of Taj Mahal since 2020 by the Proper to Info Act (RTI).
Singh had filed an RTI in 2020 with the Union ministry of Tradition looking for details about the rooms.
“Since 2020, I’ve been attempting to establish info concerning the locked rooms of Taj Mahal. I had filed an RTI. Replying to the RTI, the Union ministry of Tradition knowledgeable the Central Info Fee (in Delhi) that these rooms have been locked attributable to safety causes and no element was offered about these rooms,” he added.
“Within the RTI, I had sought particulars concerning the locked rooms (what’s inside them) and directives to open them,” Singh mentioned.
“When all my efforts failed then I’ve approached the Lucknow excessive courtroom looking for directives to the federal government to open these rooms and represent a fact-finding committee to seek out out whether or not Hindu gods and scriptures are inside them,” he added.
It could be identified that a number of right-wing organisations declare Taj Mahal to be Tejo Mahalaya, a Hindu temple.
ASI Rubbished RW Claims on Taj Mahal Time and Once more with Proof
In 2015, six attorneys filed circumstances claiming that the Taj Mahal was initially a Shiva shrine. In 2017, BJP chief Vinay Katiyar repeated the declare and requested UP CM Yogi Adityanath to journey to the monument to have a look at the Hindu sings inside. In January 2019, BJP chief Anant Kumar Hegde additionally claimed that Taj Mahal was not constructed by Shah Jahan however reasonably purchased by him from King Jayasimha.
Such claims have been put to relaxation not simply by historians but in addition by the Archeological Survey of India which has repeatedly refuted such revisionist interpretations of Taj Mahal’s historical past and dismissed claims to possession.
In February 2018, the ASI filed an affidavit in an Agra courtroom, stating that the Taj Mahal was certainly constructed as a tomb by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan who meant it to be a tomb and shrine for his Mumtaz Mahal.
(With company inputs)
Learn all of the Newest Information , Breaking Information and IPL 2022 Dwell Updates right here.
[ad_2]
Source link
.jpg)
