[ad_1]
LAHORE:
The Supreme Courtroom of Pakistan on Saturday summoned Punjab Meeting Deputy Speaker Sardar Dost Muhammad Mazari at 2 pm in relation to a petition filed by Chaudhry Pervez Elahi.
Elahi’s petition has challenged the shock ruling by Mazari which rejected PML-Q’s ten votes in the course of the course of to elect the chief minister of Punjab.
A bigger bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial heard the petition. Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Muneeb are the opposite members of the bench.
Because the proceedings commenced on the Lahore Registry of SC at the moment, Elahi’s counsel argued that the second spherical of voting for the chief minister’s slot was held yesterday however an ‘unlawful ruling’ was handed by the deputy speaker and PML-Q votes have been rejected on the bottom that he had acquired a letter from Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, who had directed the social gathering’s MPAs to vote in favour of PML-N candidate Hamza Shehbaz.
He additional mentioned that the social gathering MPAs had violated the directions and voted for Elahi and in gentle of the apex courtroom’s ruling, the votes have been rejected.
Learn extra Deciphering Article 63A: affect on our political system
Hamza will get the prize
The PML-N on Friday received a dramatic victory towards the PTI that few had predicted within the Punjab chief minister’s election, retaining the throne of Punjab after surviving its closest brush with loss within the political heartland.
Warmed within the nick of time by a letter from PML-Q head Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain — instructing his MPAs to vote for PML-N’s candidate — Hamza Shehbaz was declared a victor after Punjab Meeting Deputy Speaker Dost Mohammad Mazari dominated that PML-Q members’ votes weren’t counted in gentle of social gathering head’s letter.
Based on Mazari, Hamza acquired 179 votes whereas Elahi garnered 176 votes, however solely after 10 votes of Elahi’s personal social gathering weren’t counted, which turned the tables in Hamza’s favour.
Consistent with the ruling of the Supreme Courtroom verdict on Article 63-A associated to the defection clause, the deputy speaker mentioned he had rejected the votes of PML-Q lawmakers.
Mockingly, the apex courtroom’s verdict had served because the authorized floor to set off a second spherical of elections for the chief minister’s workplace. In accordance with the recipe ordered by the apex courtroom, the run-off polls befell 5 days after the by-polls on 20 seats that fell vacant after the disqualification of PTI defectors who voted for Hamza, in a brand new, reconstituted Home with a modified electoral school.
[ad_2]
Source link
