[ad_1]
At a press convention on September 13, Chinese language Overseas Ministry spokesman Mao Ning fielded a reporter’s query in regards to the Biden administration’s plans to broaden restrictions on semiconductor exports to China with a fiery response:
“What the U.S. is doing is technological hegemony, completely. The U.S. is making an attempt to make use of its technological superiority to include and suppress rising markets and growing nations. The U.S. offers lip service to honest competitors and a rules-based order, however its actions are about ‘America first’ and ‘Might the strongest win.’ The U.S. desires to maintain growing nations, together with China, on the decrease finish of the economic chain in perpetuity, which isn’t in any respect constructive.” [Chinese]
Folks’s Day by day promptly launched the Weibo hashtag #USRestrictionsOnSemiconductorChipExportsAreTechnologicalHegemony (#美国限制芯片出口是科技霸权主义#), attracting an avalanche of feedback, a lot of which mocked or criticized Mao Ning’s assertion and the time period “technological hegemony.” Netizens have been initially shocked that there wasn’t extra censorship of feedback, though feedback below the hashtag have been finally restricted to vetted Weibo accounts boasting “blue examine marks.” CDT editors have archived and translated a collection of the feedback that appeared earlier than censors stepped in:
没有名字-201008：[It’s like when] I offended my neighbor and so they modified their wi-fi password, after which once I couldn’t get on-line, I spent all day cursing them.
很饱了：In the event that they promote to you, it’s “technological imperialism.” In the event that they don’t promote to you, it’s “technological hegemony.” If they offer it away, you think they’ve “ulterior motives.” In the event that they don’t give it away, it’s a “technological stranglehold.” Can’t somebody please step up and clarify that it doesn’t matter what occurs, it doesn’t matter what the setback, China is all the time going to assert it’s “profitable”?
[…] 城春枫林晚：We’ve spent a long time and squandered tens of billions, so the place are are all these semiconductors we manufactured? We are able to hit them with a reciprocal ban, although—let’s ban the export of actual property, ban the export of nucleic-acid COVID testing know-how, and we’ll quickly have these People begging on their knees.
[…] 城春枫林晚：[…] Different folks have belongings you lack. Giving issues to others is a favor, not an obligation. So as a substitute of whining like a weakling in regards to the “hegemony” of others, how about placing your shoulder to the wheel and investing sufficient manpower and materials assets to proceed increase your individual energy? Those that lag behind shall be defeated. That’s been a truism for over a century.
[…] 千城74337：Not daring to open up the feedback part can be “technological hegemony.”
黑北人：Subsequent time, flip off the “share” operate, and also you’ll unite the entire nation [against you].
[…] 南宫潇湘小林：They’re limiting semiconductor chips, you’re limiting feedback—isn’t this a case of the pot calling the kettle black? What, are you afraid that everybody will be capable of see what folks really suppose?
IT魅力：Two years in the past, the federal government launched a coverage to subsidize the semiconductor business. Inside a yr, ten thousand corporations had entered the semiconductor business, and we nonetheless don’t have anything to indicate for it. It’s like “making metal in yard furnaces” another time.
[…] 普雷结与酒：After studying the feedback for about ten minutes, I refreshed the web page, and this time all of the feedback have been destructive.
[…] 王博鑫wbx：I desire a straight-A scholar to take the faculty entrance examination in my place. If the invigilator doesn’t enable it, is he being hegemonic? [Chinese]
[ad_2]
Source link
