[ad_1]
Proceedings within the Gujarat excessive court docket this week could not have but received to the underside of why a British-era bridge in Gujarat’s Morbi city collapsed, nevertheless it has made this a lot clear: The duty for the dying of 135 individuals within the tragedy lies squarely with the municipal authorities who appeared to have awarded the contract for the restore of the 140-year-old construction to an organization with none clear tendering course of, undertaken no supervision of the work completed and missed the reopening of the bridge till it collapsed on October 30. The civic physique’s repeated declare that it was unaware that the bridge was opened by the Oreva group, which was tasked with its restore and refurbishment, is hardly plausible, particularly when speaking a couple of beloved vacationer attraction in a small city — and the court docket has rightly refused to just accept this argument at face worth. Whereas blame should even be shared by contractors and sub-contractors who allegedly used sub-par supplies and minimize corners, this can not absolve native officers of abject negligence.
The court docket’s proactiveness additionally contrasts sharply with the unimpressive response from the native authorities. Regardless of three weeks having handed, the pinnacle of the corporate that carried out the restore work stays untraceable and hasn’t even been questioned. The police motion seems to have stopped at arresting some low-level officers and political response can also be muted. The top of the municipal company has been suspended, sure, however there isn’t any agency clarification for the alleged discrepancies. This isn’t uncommon in a rustic the place felony investigations typically run into hurdles created by political expediency and official hierarchies. However that doesn’t make it any much less tragic.
Get pleasure from limitless digital entry with HT Premium
Subscribe Now to proceed studying
[ad_2]
Source link
