[ad_1]
An area court docket in Islamabad on Tuesday accredited a four-day extension in PTI Senator Azam Khan Swati’s bodily remand in a “controversial tweets” case.
The PTI chief is going through prices of libel for utilizing foul language towards army officers in his tweets. He was detained for the second time in a brand new case on November 27, since his arrest within the first case of controversial tweets towards senior army officers. Swati was despatched on a two-day bodily remand following his arrest.
Throughout the listening to at this time, a plea for not presenting Swati in court docket was accepted.
Senior civil choose Muhammad Shabbir remarked that Swati should not be offered in court docket until the following orders.
Later, the court docket prolonged Swati’s reman until December 3.
IHC orders deputy attorney-general to hunt dwelling secretary’s directives
In the meantime, the Islamabad Excessive Courtroom (IHC) ordered the deputy attorney-general to hunt directives from the house secretary on the instances towards PTI Senator Azam Khan Swati.
Swati had approached the IHC through a plea on Monday, fearing “custodial killing”.
On the outset of the listening to of Swati’s plea, his lawyer Babar Awan appeared earlier than Justice Aamer Farooq.
“Azam Swati is presently in bodily remand, whereas 50 instances have been registered towards him throughout the nation,” Awan mentioned.
He requested the court docket to hunt the main points of all instances towards the PTI chief by way of the house secretary.
“Till all particulars relating to the instances towards my shopper should not obtained, he should not be given into anybody’s custody,” the lawyer requested.
He mentioned that many of the instances towards Swati are registered in Sindh and Balochistan.
At this, the court docket inquired how does the house secretary have management over the provincial inspector generals of police (IGP).
Responding to the query, Awan mentioned that the house secretary has authority over the provincial IGPs.
At this, the court docket ordered the deputy attorney-general to take directives from the house secretary.
“Examine if the house secretary has the authority as it’s being acknowledged, and inform the court docket,” the court docket mentioned, earlier than adjourning the listening to until Friday.
[ad_2]
Source link
