[ad_1]
Categorical Information Service
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court docket lately constituted a panel consisting of three senior IPS officers to probe into the allegations of misuse of funds for the Nationwide Rural Well being Mission (NRHM) programme by the Nagaland authorities.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and JK Maheshwari additionally directed the panel to submit a report back to the competent court docket inside six months.
“Essentially the most applicable recourse, to which there isn’t any critical objection from each side additionally, can be to represent one other SIT comprising three senior IPS officers of IPS Cadre, ideally direct recruits, to additional examine the allegations and if any substance in such allegations is discovered, to submit a supplementary charge-sheet,” the court docket mentioned in its order.
The bench additionally directed the newly constituted panel to look into all of the allegations and in addition take into account the CAG Report.
Court docket’s order was handed in a plea which was filed by social activist Rosemary Dzuvichu towards Guahati HCs order handed in her plea looking for an unbiased probe into the misuse and embezzlement of funds supplied by the centre to the state for implementing programmes beneath NHRM. Though the HC after perusing Technical Verification and the Inquiry Report dated seventh July 2013 and formal F.I.R dated thirtieth July 2014 felt happy with the motion taken by authorities in direction of investigating the allegations however she nonetheless approached the SC on account of being dissatisfied by HCs order.
It was alleged within the plea earlier than SC that NHRMs Engineering Division had made bulk advances in money towards numerous fictitious works however as an alternative of and kick-backs have been allegedly paid to excessive rating NRHM officers. The plea additionally mentioned, “As a substitute of extending serving to hand to pregnant ladies or lactating moms and little youngsters on the public well being centres, the funds supplied by the Authorities of India have been allegedly spent on buying of excessive and luxurious automobiles.”
Denying the allegations state’s Advocate Common submitted {that a} thorough probe had been performed. He additionally added that not solely part of the allegations have been turned down by the Comptroller and Auditor Common of India however even the remainder of the allegations have been additionally completely probed and a chargesheet was additionally filed after the completion of the investigation by a Particular Investigation Group.
Contemplating the contentions, the court docket had mentioned, “We’re of the view that this Court docket is just not the proper discussion board for the investigation or to succeed in any logical conclusion with respect to the veracity of the allegations levelled by the appellant. Equally, the impartiality, objectivity and equity of the investigation carried out by the SIT will probably be thought-about by the Court docket of competent jurisdiction in the end of time. It’s inappropriate for this Court docket to make any expression on these points as it’d unwittingly prejudice any of the events.”
[ad_2]
Source link
