[ad_1]
Together with different prudent prices of as much as ₹5.33 crore and a income hole of ₹64 crore, KPTCL had urged the fee to get well ₹2,803 crore from Escoms which might be handed onto the patron tariffs.
In a public listening to known as by the Karnataka Electrical energy Regulatory Fee (KERC) on Monday, Karnataka Energy Transmission Company Restricted (KPTCL) acquired flak from business our bodies for a proposal to get well ₹2,734 crore from Escoms, in direction of the State authorities’s portion of extra worker price in direction of pension and gratuity (P and G) expenditure.
Together with different prudent prices of as much as ₹5.33 crore and a income hole of ₹64 crore, KPTCL had prayed to the fee to get well ₹2,803 crore from Escoms which might be handed onto the patron tariff.
The listening to reviewed the annual efficiency of 2021–22 and acquired objections for the tariff proposal submitted by KPTCL for 12 months 2023–24.
N. Manjula, Managing Director, KPTCL, stated that in 2021–22, towards an annual income requirement of ₹4,171 crore, round ₹4,106 crore was acquired from transmission tariff, leading to a income hole of ₹64 crore.
Srinath Bhandari, Chairman, Vitality Panel, Karnataka Small Scale Industries Affiliation (KASSIA), argued that claiming P&G funds by the tariff would severely influence MSMEs, which have nonetheless not recovered from the pandemic.
“For 20 years now, the federal government has solely paid it. Why are they transferring the burden onto customers now? This can have an effect of as much as ₹1 per unit.”
Talking on behalf of the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Business (FKCCI), Sridhar Prabhu, an advocate, questioned how the P&G expenditure might be handed onto tariffs, if the rule to get well it got here into impact solely from January 6, 2023.
“KPTCL’s tariff proposal was submitted in November, 2022, when the rule was not revealed within the gazette. Therefore, the restoration can’t be claimed this 12 months, however within the subsequent 12 months.”
He additionally added that because the legal responsibility nonetheless remained with the federal government and never KPTCL, there was no corresponding obligation on the fee to go it onto the customers.
Nevertheless, KPTCL officers retorted that there was a authorities order in November which stated that P&G bills ought to be collected by KPTCL and Escoms in 2023–24, till the subsequent order is handed.
After listening to the objections, P. Ravi Kumar, Chairman, KERC, instructed KPTCL officers to look at if the legal responsibility switch had occurred. “The rule asks to say the federal government portion of it. If the legal responsibility is with the federal government, then it won’t be yours (KPTCL’s) to say. Look at this totally,” he stated.
Expenditure exponentially increased for UG cables
KPTCL officers revealed that there’s a fund crunch to transform overhead cables to underground cables. “As that is the election time, there’s strain from each nook to place overhead cables underground. With out entering into the nitty-gritties, the conversion would require over ₹12,000 crore. The prices of those will probably be 28 occasions increased and this has change into a significant downside. We want assist for a similar,” stated N. Manjula, MD, KPTCL.
15,100 MW peak load
Underneath its achievements, KPTCL listed that on February 8, a peak load of 15,100 MW was met by its transmission community. Equally, on March 18, 2022, a peak load of 14,818 MW was recorded.
[ad_2]
Source link
