[ad_1]
SINGAPORE — A number of Members of Parliament, together with The Employees’ Celebration’s Louis Chua (Sengkang GRC), raised questions in Parliament final week over the Keppel Offshore and Marine bribery case, which had been addressed by Minister within the Prime Minister’s Workplace Indranee Rajah on Feb 6.
In a Fb submit on Sunday (Feb 12), nonetheless, Mr Chua wrote that “there have been issues that the non-prosecution of the six people might injury Singapore and its popularity extra so than the acts perpetrated by the Authorities-linked firm per se.”
He had requested questions concerning the resolution in opposition to prosecuting the six people concerned within the case, particularly “what weightage has been given to the assorted related elements such because the culpability of every particular person, the accessible proof and what’s acceptable within the circumstances; and whether or not that is according to the Authorities’s political dedication and management and a tradition of zero tolerance in opposition to corruption.”
The Public Prosecutor had determined to subject stern warnings as an alternative of prosecuting the case. The six people in query had been former senior administration workers from Keppel Offshore and Marine Restricted.
“There’s a lack of adequate proof, both documentary, or by means of witnesses, which might set up any prison cost past an affordable doubt in opposition to a selected particular person,” Ms Rajah had stated in her reply.
The Minister additionally underlined that there have been no adjustments to the nation’s zero-tolerance coverage relating to corruption. She additionally stated that the CPIB (Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau) and AGC (Lawyer-Basic’s Chambers) “are observing the essential guidelines for a good and simply prison justice system” including that “what might be inferred from that is that whereas Singapore has zero-tolerance on corruption, it additionally strongly adheres to the rule of regulation.”
Mr Chua had additionally filed a query asking what the offences are below the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960 (PCA) that had been thought-about for prosecution for the six former Keppel administration and what the utmost penalty is for these offences below the PCA.
“I’m suggested that related potential offences had been thought-about by the PP (Public Prosecutor),” Ms Rajah stated.
Mr Chua requested supplementary questions relating to whether or not the six people in query had licensed the fee of the bribes and whether or not they had been conscious of its fee.
Had they been conscious, what did they do with this info, he requested.
Ms Rajah stated that she didn’t know, as a result of she didn’t conduct the investigations.
“What I do perceive from the investigations is that CPIN says that the six haven’t made any admissions.” /TISG
Employees’ Celebration recordsdata parliamentary questions for Prime Minister in relation to six workers of Keppel Offshore & Marine Ltd
Ship in your scoops to information@theindependent.sg
– Commercial –
[ad_2]
Source link
