[ad_1]
The allegations pertain to acquisition of surveillance copter drones and mini remotely piloted plane which can be being undertaken on a fast-track foundation below the emergency monetary powers route granted to the armed forces. Underneath this route, forces should purchase gear value as much as ₹300 crore per challenge on a quick foundation, with deliveries to be ensured by the winner inside a yr.
Complaints acquired by the defence ministry in addition to Military HQ allege that in trials in Tawang (Arunachal Pradesh) and north Sikkim final month, at the least 4 corporations supplied the identical gear, giving its unique producer a bonus over the competitors.
Military officers, nevertheless, have countered that three entities had shaped consortiums with a lead unique gear producer and supplied completely different fashions of drones, which is allowed below acquisition guidelines of the defence ministry.
Within the surveillance copter case, (the Military is seeking to buy 1,000 methods for border duties) officers stated that one of many bidders was discovered to be non-compliant and was eradicated from the competitors because it had submitted the identical gear as the unique producer.
It’s also learnt that within the case of mini remotely piloted plane too, one firm was disqualified by the Military because it had supplied the identical gear as the unique producer, additionally triggering a proper criticism of cartelisation by the competitors.
Whereas contract orders below the emergency route are of a comparatively decrease worth beneath ₹300 crore, there’s intense competitors as an order paves the best way for induction of a a lot bigger amount sooner or later.
[ad_2]
Source link
