[ad_1]
LAHORE:
Captain (retd) Muhammad Safdar stated on Thursday that former premier and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) supremo Nawaz Sharif is the one chief who can “enhance Pakistan’s destiny and pull it out from the present drawback”.
He, nonetheless, supported the stance of conducting elections throughout the stipulated time of 90 days from the dissolution of the Nationwide Meeting.
The assertion got here amid divided opinions concerning the date of the approaching normal elections.
Pakistan Peoples Get together (PPP) co-chair Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has repeatedly demanded that the Election Fee of Pakistan (ECP) maintain the election throughout the constitutional timeframe of 90 days.
The ECP, nonetheless, insists on the voting after recent delimitation of constituencies on the premise of the brand new census. The recent delimitation course of required a 120-day time interval. The election schedule might be introduced after that, which might unfold over 54 days.
The PML-N has been saying all alongside that the elections must be held on the premise of recent constituencies.
Learn Bilawal takes a dig at PML-N on ballot date
Safdar made the remarks whereas speaking to the media outdoors a district courtroom the place he appeared for a listening to of his acquittal purposes.
He stated, “Nawaz Sharif’s solely fault was denying the extension of tenure of then COAS [chief of army staff] Basic Qamar Javed Bajwa.”
“The observe of giving extensions must be stopped instantly,” he added.
Continuing
Because the proceedings commenced, the petitioner’s counsel Advocate Khawar Malik argued that “tales in each FIRs had been nothing however concocted merely to humiliate Captain (retd) Safdar”.
He contended that the PML-N chief had nothing to do with these circumstances including that he was implicated merely to be humiliated and the FIRs are “clear proof of the political victimisation”.
He additional argued that earlier than inserting 124-A of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) within the FIR it’s essential to get permission from the deputy commissioner however on this case, due course of was not adopted
Learn Extra PML-N to go solo in Punjab elections
Advocate Malik maintained that Lahore Excessive Court docket’s (LHC) Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan had struck down 124-A of the PPC, terming it unconstitutional.
Safdar’s counsel informed the courtroom that “LHC judges have noticed that this clause has been used for vested pursuits and political good points”.
In the meantime, Islampura police submitted a report earlier than the courtroom requesting to discharge the FIRs as there isn’t any ample materials accessible in opposition to the accused particular person.
After listening to the arguments, the courtroom reserved the choice.
It’s price mentioning that two FIRs had been registered in opposition to Nawaz’s son-in-law within the Islampura police station beneath completely different fees, together with Upkeep of Public Order (MPO) and 124-A & 506 of the PPC.
[ad_2]
Source link
