[ad_1]
Moody’s on Aadhaar
It’s not clear why it takes a worldwide score main similar to Moody’s Buyers Service to flag issues about “safety and privateness vulnerabilities” in centralised identification programs similar to India’s Aadhaar programme (Web page 1, September 25).
All alongside, it’s the Indian authorities companies which made the adoption of Aadhaar a widespread phenomenon. It’s moderately puzzling why the Indian companies had not come throughout and flagged such safety and privateness vulnerabilities not to mention recommend remedial measures to the vulnerabilities. Surfacing of ‘vulnerabilities’ within the Aadhaar programme now could be more likely to trigger a sure degree of confusion within the minds of residents of this nation. It’s excessive time the federal government of the day clarifies all attainable doubts within the public area earlier than it’s too late.
A. Venkatasubramanian,
Tiruchi, Tamil Nadu
It’s at all times straightforward to level to shortcomings in any new initiative. No man-made system might be good. The direct advantages switch has helped tens of millions of Indians. We’ve got loads of naysayers, pessimists and ‘I informed you so’s’ within the nation. Allow us to not throw the infant out with the bathtub water.
M.R. Raghunath,
Bengaluru
Parliamentary conduct
How lengthy can we proceed to name ourselves a various and inclusive democracy the place on the one hand, Members of Parliament from the Opposition get suspended for petty violations whereas on the opposite, communal slurs and abuses by a Member of Parliament from the ruling social gathering (Editorial, September 25) invite no strict motion straight away?
Mere warning in opposition to a repeat efficiency or a present trigger discover is not any reply to questionable conduct seen within the nation’s highest discussion board of debate.
Bhavya Pathak,
Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand
[ad_2]
Source link
