The Qatar death row and India’s options

A glimpse of the train Zair-Al-Bahr carried out between the Indian Navy and the Qatar Emiri Navy within the Persian Gulf close to Abu Dhabi.
| Photograph Credit score: PTI

On October 26, Qatar’s native courtroom handed down the demise penalty to eight former Indian Navy officers. The case has garnered worldwide consideration.

In August 2022, the eight officers have been detained in Doha by Qatari intelligence authorities. They labored for Dahra World Applied sciences and Consultancy Companies, which served Qatar’s defence and safety companies. Authorized proceedings encountered delays, together with the rejection of the preliminary bail plea one month after the arrest. The primary trial was held in March 2023. In October, consular entry was granted, and the Indian Ambassador met the detainees. However the scenario took a grim activate October 26 with the native courtroom’s verdict.

Comparable incidents

The case shares similarities with different incidents involving the arrest of Indian nationals by overseas authorities. For example, Kulbhushan Jadhav, an Indian nationwide, was sentenced to demise in 2017 in Pakistan on prices of espionage and sabotage. Pakistan accused him of performing on the behest of India’s intelligence company, which India denies. The case proceeded in a navy courtroom with no transparency. India moved the Worldwide Court docket of Justice (ICJ), which discovered that Pakistan had breached Article 36 of the Vienna Conference requiring instant notification of an arrest to the nationwide’s consulate. It ordered Pakistan to overview the method of Jadhav’s trial and conviction, and supply India with consular entry.

Editorial | Thriller trial: On the case of the previous Indian Navy personnel in Qatar

In a separate incident, Indian Air Pressure pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman’s plane was shot down by Pakistani fighter jets after he took down a Pakistani F-16 fighter jet. He was captured on the Pakistani facet of the Line of Management, however was launched about 60 hours later following intense back-channel communications between India and Pakistan.

In each cases, the people concerned have been reluctant to reveal their identities, mirroring the current scenario. India both mitigated their sentences or introduced them again to their house nation by way of diplomatic means.

India’s choices

India has the choice to provoke authorized appeals inside the Qatari authorized system. As per Article 110 of the Penal Code of Qatar, partaking in espionage is thought to be a critical legal offence. Espionage is legally outlined because the act of accumulating or transmitting confidential info or paperwork to a overseas state or its brokers with the intent to hurt Qatar’s nationwide safety or pursuits. Penalties may end up in imprisonment not exceeding 15 years, relying on the gravity of the offence. Throughout instances of battle, the punishment might escalate to life imprisonment or the demise penalty. It’s noteworthy that Qatar has not disclosed details about the decision. India can pursue a authorized battle with the goal of decreasing the sentence to imprisonment.

In 2015, India and Qatar signed an settlement pertaining to the switch of sentenced prisoners. Beneath the settlement, Indian residents who’re sentenced in Qatar have the selection to serve their jail sentence of their house nation. If the authorized appeals in Qatar’s judiciary don’t yield the specified final result, India might flip to the ICJ as a way of redress. Simply as within the Jadhav case, there was a delay in notifying the Indian embassy right here too.

The Vienna Conference on Consular Relations gives the framework for consular relations between sovereign states. Article 36 of the Conference is central to this case, because it offers with communication and get in touch with with nationals of the sending state. The Conference’s Elective Protocol grants the ICJ obligatory jurisdiction over disputes arising from its interpretation or software. As talked about earlier, Article 36 of the Vienna Conference requires instant notification of an arrest and the suitable to consulate entry.

India has the capability to provoke diplomatic efforts aimed toward resolving the case. The connection between India and Qatar has yielded vital financial ties. Qatar is the most important supplier of liquefied pure fuel to India. Whereas India’s defence collaboration with Qatar has been considerably restricted, it nonetheless presents an avenue for diplomatic engagement. The Indian group represents the most important expatriate group in Qatar. The remittances despatched to India by the group quantity to an estimated $750 million yearly. Furthermore, a gradual stream of Indian artists performs in Qatar at occasions organised by group associations affiliated with the Indian Cultural Centre. By harnessing these strong ties with Qatar, New Delhi can exert stress on the Qatari authorities to undertake a extra lenient strategy in the direction of the detained people, probably providing them some reduction.

Quite a few international human rights organisations have been actively combating illegal imprisonment, capital punishment, and different violations of human rights. Amnesty Worldwide, as an example, has constantly championed human rights on a world scale. These organisations even have the potential to mobilise and advocate for the Indian Navy officers who’re dealing with the demise penalty.

It is a difficult diplomatic challenge that requires cautious consideration and strategic motion. India’s response ought to bear in mind the implications of the Vienna Conference on Consular Relations, worldwide precedents, and the broader context of India-Qatar relations. Whether or not by way of diplomatic dialogues, political interventions, authorized appeals, or a mix of those methods, India has the potential to hunt a decision.

Hasan Mohammed Jinnah is Tamil Nadu State Public Prosecutor