[ad_1]
- CJP Isa will evaluation the complaints towards judges.
- He’s additionally more likely to handle objections by fellow judges.
- Justice Naqvi seeks recusal of CJP Isa and different judges.
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa has summoned a Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) assembly on November 20 to evaluation the complaints towards apex courtroom judges.
The chief justice’s resolution to name the assembly comes after complaints had been obtained towards Justices Sayyed Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi and Sardar Tariq Masood.
Within the assembly, CJP Isa is anticipated to evaluate the filed complaints, whereas the SJC is more likely to handle objections raised by the aforementioned apex courtroom judges regarding the chief justice himself and Justice Naeem Afghan’s involvement in listening to the complaints towards them.
Justice Naqvi has just lately submitted his preliminary reply to a present trigger discover issued to him by the SJC and raised objections over the participation of three members of fee, together with CJP Isa, Justice Masood and Justice Naeem Afghan, and sought their recusal based mostly on “bias” and different grounds.
Justice Naqvi claimed the proceedings towards him with regard to misconduct are politically motivated and lack legality, propriety and transparency.
Within the 18-page doc, Justice Naqvi wrote: “Their participation within the proceedings leading to a present trigger discover being issued to me taints these proceedings, inter alia, with bias and makes all orders handed in such proceedings as being with out lawful authority and of no authorized impact.”
The choose objected that CJP Isa and Justice Afghan being the chairman and member of the inquiry fee, respectively, investigating the audio leaks case towards him, can’t take part within the SJC’s proceedings towards him.
“The [inquiry commission] proceedings are sub judice. The identical alleged audio leaks which had been referred to the inquiry fee are subject material of the complaints towards me earlier than SJC. The SRO remains to be within the discipline. S.R.O. 596(I)/2023 dated Could 19, 2023 is hooked up as Annex L. Order of the Supreme Court docket dated Could 26, 2023, handed in Structure Petitions No.14 to 17 of 2023 is hooked up as Annexure M,” he said.
Furthermore, he maintained the identical about Justice Masood, basing his objection on the declare that the choose is “disqualified from listening to these complaints as a member of SJC after having expressed an opinion on the complaints towards me”.
He mentioned that Justice Masood’s opinion expressed in a few letters established that “he has already fashioned a view within the matter”.
Justice Naqvi mentioned that Justice Masood intentionally delayed his opinion until the change within the composition of the SJC following former CJP Umar Ata Bandial.
Furthermore, the choose maintained that Justice Masood can also be one of many judges who’re dealing with a criticism towards him earlier than the SJC.
[ad_2]
Source link
