[ad_1]
The Supreme Court docket on Monday requested the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to submit a response to the Election Fee of Pakistan’s (ECP) report in a case associated to the level-playing subject forward of the upcoming polls.
A 3-member bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and comprising Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musarrat Hilali, heard the case.
“We’re the Supreme Court docket, not the federal government, we’re not working anybody’s marketing campaign,” the CJP mentioned after PTI counsel Latif Khosa complained that the get together members have been being subjected to political victimisation forward of February 8 elections.
The CJP added Part 144 and Upkeep of Public Order (MPO) will likely be relevant to everybody, not any single political get together.
The proceedings of the case have been broadcast dwell on SC’s web site and YouTube channel.
PTI lawyer Latif Khosa got here introduced arguments on behalf of Advocate Shoaib Shaheen, who filed the attraction within the courtroom.
On the final listening to, the SC issued notices to the Punjab inspector normal of police (IGP), chief secretary, and advocate normal, looking for their response on the PTI’s allegations relating to alleged harassment of their candidates and get together leaders.
On December 22, the highest courtroom directed the ECP to handle PTI’s concern relating to the level-playing subject on the previous ruling get together’s petition.
In keeping with the courtroom’s order, the ECP representatives met the PTI delegation and warranted them of addressing its grievances within the lead as much as the February 8 nationwide vote.
Nonetheless, the get together filed one other petition on December 26, looking for contempt of courtroom proceedings towards the ECP over the electoral physique’s alleged failure to make sure a level-playing subject.
ECP Particular Secretary Dr Syed Asif Hussain on Sunday rejected the PTI’s allegations that it was not being supplied a stage taking part in subject for the February 8 elections and requested the Supreme Court docket to “dismiss the contempt petition with a penalty”.
The ECP official mentioned this in reply to the PTI petition, demanding the SC to start contempt of courtroom proceedings towards the ECP secretary, inspectors normal of police (IGPs), chief secretaries of the 4 provinces and inside secretary over non-compliance of the apex courtroom order handed on December 22, 2023.
[ad_2]
Source link
