[ad_1]
NEWTON COUNTY — In a unanimous vote, the Newton County Board of Commissioners voted to approve a decision to just accept the change of property from Gaither’s Church Inc. to the county.
The transaction concerned Gaither Church giving land to the county at 2863 Henderson Mill Highway. at an appraisal of $120,800. In trade, the county would give land situated at 3026 Henderson Mill Highway. appraised at $21,650 in addition to a portion of 10 Digsby Highway at an appraised worth of $52,100 for a complete $73,750.
On this deal, the county would obtain 5.78 acres while the church would obtain 3.84 acres. It was additionally famous that the worth and acreage of the property that the county would obtain would exceed what Gaither’s Church would obtain.
District 4 consultant J.C. Henderson had questions concerning the property trade, asking if this could have an effect on any future reservoir plans that the county might have. This was among the many dialogue factors for this trade.
Priya Patel – an legal professional for Jarrad and Davis filling in for county legal professional Patrick Jaugstetter – clarified a few of the circumstances of the land parcels in query.
“There’s a number of parcels included and lots of these parcels had caveats and circumstances that mentioned if the county doesn’t construct the reservoir inside a sure time interval that the property reverts again to the property homeowners,” Patel mentioned. “My understanding is that we’ve already began that means of giving the property again for the reason that county didn’t transfer ahead with the reservoir.”
Henderson mentioned that as a result of inhabitants development, there could also be plans for a reservoir sooner or later, which may complicate the land trade.
“I believe in the identical sense, there is likely to be a doable reservoir sooner or later relying on the inhabitants, and as our inhabitants is rising,” Henderson mentioned. “You can give it again to them however for those who want it in 10 years, then you definitely needed to condemn it once more from them.”
County supervisor Harold Cooper would later make clear what the property trade may intel if a reservoir have been to be constructed.
“The property that we’re receiving is of upper worth and we’re conscious that the church might should be condemned if the water reservoir is a matter,” Cooper mentioned. “If a feasibility examine is required and this board would really like that then we’ll try this.”
Chairman Marcello Banes mentioned that he “was nearly optimistic” a examine was carried out to find out how a lot water was wanted for a possible new reservoir all the way in which out to 2075.
Henderson acknowledged that whereas he was in favor of the land trade, that the county might wish to have a look at a future reservoir – as soon as once more citing the expansion inside the county.
The movement to approve the land trade was made by District 1 consultant Stan Edwards and seconded by District 5 consultant Ronnie Cowan. It handed 5-0.
[ad_2]
Source link
