[ad_1]
A Delhi court docket on Saturday granted exemption to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal from private look for the day in reference to a grievance filed by the Enforcement Directorate towards him over non-compliance with its summonses in a cash laundering case linked to the now-scrapped excise coverage.
IMAGE: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. {Photograph}: ANI Picture
Further chief metropolitan Justice of the Peace Divya Malhotra granted aid to Kejriwal after the Aam Aadmi Occasion chief appeared earlier than the court docket through videoconferencing and urged for exemption from bodily look for the day.
Kejriwal informed the court docket that he was unable to seem earlier than it as a result of ongoing Price range session of the Delhi meeting.
Showing for Kejriwal, senior advocate Ramesh Gupta informed the court docket that the Delhi chief minister will seem earlier than it in individual on the following date of listening to.
The court docket has adjourned the matter to March 16.
In its grievance, the Enforcement Directorate has alleged that the Delhi chief minister deliberately didn’t wish to obey the summonses and stored on giving “lame excuses”.
If a high-ranking public functionary like him disobeyed the regulation, it will “set a improper instance for the widespread man ie the “Aam Aadmi”, the company stated.
From the contents of the grievance and the fabric positioned on report, prima facie offence beneath Part 174 of the Indian Penal Code is made out and there are enough grounds for continuing towards the accused Arvind Kejriwal, the decide had earlier stated.
“Accordingly, difficulty summons to accused Arvind Kejriwal for the offence beneath Part 174 of the IPC for February 17, 2024,” the decide had added.
Part 174 of the IPC pertains to non-attendance in obedience to an order from a public servant.
The ED on February 3 filed a contemporary grievance case towards Kejriwal for non-compliance of its summonses.
The AAP convenor had earlier written to the ED, describing the summonses issued to him as “unlawful and politically motivated”.
He had alleged that the summonses have been aimed toward stopping him from campaigning in elections.
[ad_2]
Source link
