When guests and native researchers within the Netherlands realized earlier final month that two panels honoring Black American troopers who helped liberate Europe from the Nazis had disappeared from the U.S. army cemetery at Margraten, the response was swift.
Native officers demanded explanations, historians raised issues, and the story shortly unfold by Dutch and worldwide media. The nation’s main Holocaust museums and World Conflict II memorial facilities issued a joint letter urging the US to revive the shows, and greater than 30 members of the U.S. Congress despatched their very own letter in search of solutions.
However the explanations publicly supplied had been solely partial. The American Battle Monuments Fee, which manages Margraten and all abroad U.S. army cemeteries, stated the reveals had been merely a part of a routine rotation in a restricted visitor-center area. Officers didn’t instantly deal with why one of many eliminated panels — the one explaining that the U.S. Military was segregated throughout World Conflict II and describing the racism Black troopers confronted at dwelling — had been taken down.
Now, inner emails obtained by the Jewish Telegraphic Company by a Freedom of Data Act request reveal, for the primary time, how the choice unfolded contained in the company. They present that the pinnacle of the monuments fee on the time, Charles Djou, was intently monitoring a flurry of govt orders issued by President Donald Trump after his return to the White Home.
The data point out that Djou hoped to maintain his small company out of Trump’s crosshairs and moved shortly to keep away from attracting unfavorable consideration from the brand new administration.
On March 19, the day Trump signed an govt order banning foreign-facing companies from selling what he known as “discriminatory fairness ideology,” Djou instructed his employees to make sure the monuments fee was in full compliance, despite the fact that, he famous, the order didn’t particularly apply to the company.
Below the topic line, “International DEI,” Djou requested whether or not the company’s inner databases cataloging fallen African-American and Native American troops might now pose an issue, and whether or not any shows at abroad customer facilities may “get us in hassle.”
One exhibit particularly drew his concern: a panel on the Netherlands American Cemetery and Memorial, the place greater than 8,000 Individuals who helped liberate Europe from the Nazis are buried. Put in the earlier yr, the panel defined that the U.S. army was segregated throughout World Conflict II and highlighted the Black troops who fought each the Germans overseas and racism at dwelling.
A senior staffer replied that he had already scrubbed the company’s web site of doubtless noncompliant materials and warned that the Margraten panel was certainly “an issue.” Djou’s deputy, Robert Dalessandro, went additional: “I agree on the Netherlands. That panel ought to go. Frankly, it by no means ought to have been there within the first place.”
Djou ordered the panel eliminated “to keep away from elevating any ire of the administration.” In a follow-up electronic mail, he urged protecting it in storage no less than till “a brand new admin in 2029.”

Former U.S. Rep. Charles Djou, left, participates in a mock swearing-in ceremony with then-Speaker of the Home Rep. Nancy Pelosi, proper, alongside his spouse and daughters, Might 25, 2010 in Washington, D.C. (Alex Wong/Getty Pictures)
The proactive maneuvering mirrored the environment of the second, as Trump overseers changed company heads and purged federal companies of perceived ideological disloyalty. And Djou might have felt particularly weak. He was not only a holdover from the earlier administration — he was a former Republican who had publicly criticized Trump for years and finally endorsed Joe Biden in 2020.
However Djou’s efforts to adjust to the administration’s agenda didn’t save him. Simply weeks after the panel got here down, Djou was out of the job.
“We had a secretary who was appointed by Biden, and fearful that he was going to lose his job, so he over-complied at any time when he might, so he didn’t draw consideration, and that’s only a reality, and that was an issue,” Dalessandro, who turned the appearing head of the company after Djou’s departure, stated in an interview.
Djou didn’t reply to a request for remark.
The American Battle Monuments Fee launched an announcement acknowledging the explanation for the removing of the panel that emerged from the inner emails.
“The Netherlands American Cemetery, with its singular mission to honor those that fell in fight and are buried and memorialized there, is just not the suitable venue for deciphering or debating broader societal points, nevertheless actual and vital these points had been and are,” the company stated in a written assertion.
The company added, “This determination doesn’t diminish the important position African American troopers performed within the struggle effort, nor does it overlook the challenges they endured at dwelling.”
Dalessandro requested so as to add context to the e-mail by which he appeared to agree with Djou about eradicating the panel. He clarified that his opposition was to not the panel’s message, however as a result of it featured Jefferson Wiggins, a servicemember who was not interred on the cemetery. Wiggins is linked to the location as a result of he helped dig the graves.
“We’ve got 10,000 service members both buried or memorialized at that cemetery, of which Wiggins is just not one,” Dalessandro stated. “He lived by the struggle.”
Dalessandro added, “I don’t reduce the truth that he served. I applaud that, however I’ve an issue when it’s our important mission to inform the tales of these memorialized or interred within the cemetery, and we stray from that mission. It had nothing to do with African Individuals. I wouldn’t care what race, coloration, creed that man was.”
Janice Wiggins, the widow of the grave digger featured within the show, stated the company’s determination felt like an erasure. She famous that the panels had been created solely after months of lobbying and had been all the time meant as a everlasting commemoration, not a rotating exhibit.
“The removing of those panels and all reference to Black troopers is extra than simply disrespectful,” she stated in an announcement. “It’s insulting to the Black liberators who served and to the legacies their households cherish.”
Critics of the choice had been already working beneath the idea that there was extra to the removing of the sample than a routine curatorial replace.
Ken Greenberg, nationwide govt director of the Jewish Conflict Veterans of the US of America, stated the choice units a harmful precedent.
“Eradicating historical past is unsuitable,” he stated in an interview. “Are you attempting to erase what these Black service members did, or cover it, or banish it? That’s simply unsuitable.”
The cemetery at Margraten additionally holds specific significance for Jewish veterans. It’s the burial web site of Maj. Gen. Maurice Rose, the highest-ranking Jewish American officer killed in World Conflict II and one of many U.S. Military’s most revered armored commanders. Rose, the Denver-born son of a rabbi, is believed by historians to have listed himself as Protestant throughout his army service to keep away from antisemitic discrimination that was widespread on the time. He’s commemorated with a monument exterior the Colorado State Capitol and by Denver’s Rose Medical Heart.

A portray of Main Normal Maurice Rose together with two copies of the brand new monument are positioned on a desk throughout a commemorative celebration at Historical past Colorado on April 16, 2023 in Denver, Colorado. (Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Put up by way of Getty Pictures)
A coalition of Dutch World Conflict II museums, together with the Anne Frank Home, despatched a letter to the U.S. ambassador urging intervention after studying the panels had been eliminated, arguing that erasing the position of African Individuals from the liberation narrative is a severe omission.
“Talking on behalf of the museums and memorial facilities within the Netherlands, we worth an inclusive account of the liberation, and if there’s any political interference in how the Second World Conflict is represented, we strongly object,” stated Liesbeth Bijvoet, an official with the Jewish Cultural Quarter, a museum advanced in Amsterdam devoted to Jewish historical past, tradition, and the Holocaust.
There’s a motive the removing set off such alarm amongst establishments dedicated to Holocaust reminiscence, based on Kees Ribbens, a senior researcher on the NIOD Institute for Conflict, Holocaust and Genocide Research. In latest many years, museums and memorial facilities within the Netherlands have labored to maneuver past what Kees known as “black-and-white” narratives that dominated the fast postwar years, creating exhibitions that confront Dutch collaboration, passivity, and the total multicultural dimensions of the struggle — together with the long-overlooked presence of Black American troopers at Margraten.
Ribbens stated that erasing these troopers from the story seems like a retreat to an older, simplified understanding of World Conflict II.
“Many individuals had been dissatisfied, if not outraged, as a result of it very a lot seems like historical past is being rewritten, however not in a approach that creates higher understanding,” Ribbens stated, including that eradicating the panels indicators “a push again to a former interval,” as if the position of African-American troops had been as soon as once more one thing to be denied or forgotten.
Even some who share the Trump administration’s issues concerning the range, fairness, and inclusion, or DEI, framework are important of the panels’ removing.
David Bernstein is the founding father of the North American Values Institute, one of the vital distinguished Jewish critics of DEI, and the creator of a guide known as “Woke Antisemitism: How a Progressive Ideology Harms Jews.”
“The trouble to take away recognition of Black army participation has little to do with ending DEI even whether it is framed as such by authorities officers,” Bernstein stated.
He believes the transfer displays a misguided push for color-blindness that erases important truths. Whereas he argues that DEI usually imposes an ideological lens that fuels division, Bernstein stated establishments can reject these practices with out abandoning a fuller account of World Conflict II — together with racism within the ranks and the contributions of Black troops.
“Jewish folks have a particular obligation to recollect and inform tales about oppression, that of our personal and others,” he stated. “We all know the hazards of extinguishing inconvenient recollections and sanitizing historical past.”
Andrew Lapin contributed reporting.














