[ad_1]
- Supreme Courtroom adjourns the case listening to for the following two weeks.
- SC additionally seeks responses from Fawad Chaudhry and Asad Umar.
- ECP alleges Khan levelled “baseless allegations” towards commisison.
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Courtroom Tuesday served notices to PTI Chairman Imran Khan and his aides — Fawad Chaudhry and Asad Umar — in contempt of the Election Fee of Pakistan’s (ECP) case.
A 3-member SC bench comprising Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ayesha A Malik, and Justice Athar Minallah heard the case filed by the ECP to switch all its contempt instances towards PTI leaders from completely different excessive courts to a single one.
The election fee has accused the ex-premier of levelling “baseless allegations” towards the ECP and its chief in his addresses on July 18, 21, 27, August 4 and 10.
At the moment’s listening to
Through the course of proceedings, the bench remarked that the election fee requested to switch the instances pending in several excessive courts to at least one excessive court docket.
The ECP was of the opinion that they need to put together for native and basic elections or needed to struggle instances in several courts, it added.
The chief justice stated that the ECP additionally offered a judicial precedent of merging instances with the order of the Supreme Courtroom. The Election Fee is counting on Article 186A, he added.
He requested the ECP counsel whether or not there was a precedent of the Supreme Courtroom to merge the instances of various excessive courts. At this, the lawyer stated that the highest court docket ordered the consolidation of revenue tax instances pending in varied excessive courts in 1999.
Upon this, the CJP stated that clubbing of instances pending in several excessive courts will need to have the identical level of legislation. He requested who have been the petitioners in contempt of election fee instances within the excessive courts.
The counsel replied that PTI leaders Khan, Chaudhry, and Umar had filed instances towards the election fee within the completely different excessive courts.
Justice Malik stated that the Supreme Courtroom, within the PEMRA instances, had declared that the excessive court docket instances would proceed and wouldn’t be clubbed.
However Justice Minallah stated that the Supreme Courtroom had clubbed all of the instances of the excessive courts within the Hajj assistants case.
The ECP counsel stated that instances of the identical nature would have conflicting judgments in several excessive courts.
Justice Malik stated that the apex court docket would determine when the conflicting selections are challenged earlier than the Supreme Courtroom.
The Chief Justice requested below which constitutional authority did the Supreme Courtroom order clubbing of instances pending within the completely different excessive courts.
The counsel then stated that the injunctions of the excessive courts within the contempt of election fee case had additionally been challenged within the Supreme Courtroom.
The court docket directed the ECP petitions towards the injunction of the excessive courts must also be fastened with this case.
Subsequently, the listening to of the case was adjourned for 2 weeks.
Petition
The ECP, in its petition, had acknowledged that it had issued contempt notices to PTI chief Khan in addition to different social gathering leaders, together with Umar and Chaudhry within the months of August and September.
Nonetheless, these notices have been challenged in excessive courts.
The ECP famous that below Part 10 of the Election Act, 2017, it had the authority to provoke contempt proceedings being a constitutional physique.
The fee additional acknowledged that Khan and Chaudhry had challenged the contempt notices earlier than the Lahore Excessive Courtroom’s Rawalpindi bench, whereas Asad Umar had challenged it earlier than the Sindh Excessive Courtroom.
One other one was challenged earlier than the Islamabad Excessive Courtroom.
— Further enter from APP
[ad_2]
Source link
