Four Censored Essays On Ukraine Crisis

“Escaping Ukraine by Bike: A Chinese language Alternate Scholar’s 5 Days On The Highway (Letter from Europe),” March 1, Wang Yiwen for Esquire Studio: 

Wang, a Chinese language pupil learning for a grasp’s diploma in journalism and communications in Denmark, relates the story of “Little Tian,” a Chinese language pupil learning in Kyiv who flees Ukraine on a bike with a pal from Iran. A parallel narrative unfolds alongside Little Tian’s escape: Wang’s worldwide classmates’ reactions to the invasion, together with Russian college students’ disgrace and ache. Little Tian tells Wang that he determined to not hunker in a dormitory basement with different Chinese language college students awaiting rescue by the Chinese language embassy, and as a substitute selected to flee after the bombing of a subway station close to campus. Throughout his escape, he learns {that a} pal has misplaced contact along with his girlfriend in a central Ukranian metropolis, after the lady instructed her boyfriend about navy planes flying overhead. On the similar time, in her graduate college classroom, Wang’s Russian classmate tells of anti-war protests in Moscow and Saint Petersburg, and says the warfare is the “disgrace and ache” of many Russians. The piece concludes with Little Tian’s secure arrival on the Polish border and a photograph of an anti-war, pro-Ukraine protest held in Aarhus, Denmark. [Chinese]

“The Inventory Market Booms, Pure Gasoline Plummets: The Most Important Change within the Russia-Ukraine Battle,” March 10, @程墨自留地 on WeChat:

On this lengthy piece, the favored blogger often known as @程墨自留地 analyzes the warfare in Ukraine in mild of a Russian international ministry spokesperson’s assertion that Russia shouldn’t be attempting to overthrow the Ukranian authorities, which might entail the abandonment of Russia’s two acknowledged warfare goals: “demilitarization” and “denazification.” After relating a prolonged checklist of topics (Russian tools loses, humanitarian evacuations, U.S. support, America’s long-arm jurisdiction, Russia’s anti-sanctions efforts, Zelensky’s speech to the British Parliament), the essay concludes that the 2 sides have reached an deadlock: Putin can not withdraw with out main concessions after the demise of so many Russian troopers, and Ukraine can not compromise after its preliminary success and the demise of so a lot of its troopers. The pivotal line of the essay reads: “To place it bluntly, one facet should resign all authorized and navy claims to sovereignty over the territories of Crimea and Japanese Ukraine to succeed in a real ceasefire.” [Chinese]

“After the Paralympic Closing Ceremonies, The Ukrainian Delegation Has No Dwelling to Return To,” March 14, Hong Weilin for Zhengmian Lianjie:

This essay features a collection of interviews with Ukrainian Paralympians, who gained 29 medals (together with 11 golds) on the Beijing Video games, second solely to China. The piece is a poignant reflection on the which means of sports activities and existence. One athlete explains, “We might have given up and never come to Beijing. That is how it’s. Bombs are exploding. Missiles are exploding. All of us perceive, if Ukraine doesn’t attend the Paralympics, then Ukraine ceases to exist.” The piece additionally displays on the particular hardships skilled by the disabled in wartime. “Individuals in wheelchairs can’t dodge bombs, and blind folks can’t outrun missiles,” Valerii Sushkevych, the president of Ukraine’s Paralympic Committee, is quoted as saying. The essay didn’t point out that Russian and Belarusian athletes had been banned from competing within the Video games. [Chinese]

“A Fierce Controversy: Is the Russia-Ukraine Battle NATO’s Fault?,” March 15, from the weblog 明白知识:

This three-part essay on the reason for the warfare in Ukraine begins with John Mearsheimer’s assertion, made in a New Yorker interview, that NATO’s eastward enlargement prompted Putin’s aggression. The second a part of the essay examines rebuttals to Mearsheimer’s argument. The creator selected to heart on Paul Poast, a professor of worldwide relations at The College of Chicago, who agrees with sure aspects of Mearsheimer’s argument however holds that Mearsheimer’s evaluation suffers from shortcomings that embody overlooking the company of Japanese European nations. Half three begins with a name for extra complete and various modes of research to grasp the warfare. As an alternative of asking,  “What was the basic purpose for the outbreak of warfare?,” the piece argues that we ought to be asking, “What are the assorted elements that result in the outbreak of warfare?” The creator additional argues that Putin has realized his lesson from the collapse of the Soviet Union, but to a sure extent continues to be solely performing within the method of his “warlike race.” In conclusion, the creator states that the Mearsheimer-Poast debate offers us with an instance of how one can constructively debate delicate subjects. The essay concludes with a quote from Bertrand Russell: “We’ve got to study to place up with the truth that some folks say issues that we don’t like. We will solely stay collectively in that manner, and if we’re to stay collectively and never die collectively we should study a type of charity and a type of tolerance which is completely very important to the continuation of human life on this planet.” [Chinese]