[ad_1]
MS Dhoni has determined to step down because the captain of Chennai Tremendous Kings (CSK). All-rounder Ravindra Jadeja might be main the CSK aspect on the upcoming season of the Indian Premier League (IPL 2022).
MS Dhoni was the captain of the franchise since 2008. He’s IPL’s one of the crucial succesful captains ever.
📑 Official Assertion 📑#WhistlePodu #Yellove 💛🦁 @msdhoni @imjadeja
— Chennai Tremendous Kings (@ChennaiIPL) March 24, 2022
“MS Dhoni has determined at hand over the management of Chennai Tremendous Kings and picked Ravindra Jadeja to guide the workforce. Jadeja, who has been an integral a part of Chennai Tremendous Kings since 2012, will solely be the third participant to guide CSK. Dhoni will proceed to symbolize Chennai Tremendous Kings this season and past,” CSK stated in an announcement.
Learn | IPL 2022: ‘Terrorists Did A Recce Of Staff Resort And Wankhede Stadium’. Safety Stepped Up In Mumbai
Dhoni has led CSK in 204 matches since 2008. He has gained 121 matches, misplaced 82 as captain of Chennai Tremendous Kings. Dhoni’s profitable share is 59.60. He gained 4 IPL titles with Chennai.
MS Dhoni stepping down because the captain of Chennai Tremendous Kings means an finish to the captaincy period that started with the ICC T20 World Cup 2007.
Royal Challengers Bangalore additionally wished the departing captain:
Congratulations on a legendary tenure as captain of CSK, @msdhoni! 🙌🏻
Can’t wait to see this bromance on the sector quickly. 🤜🏻🤛🏻#PlayBold #RCB #WeAreChallengers #IPL2022 #MSDhoni pic.twitter.com/XbH6ir91C8
— Royal Challengers Bangalore (@RCBTweets) March 24, 2022
Rajasthan Royals additionally wished their famous person from season 1:
Congrats Jaddu ©️🤗
— Rajasthan Royals (@rajasthanroyals) March 24, 2022
Within the final season, MS Dhoni performed an vital function in taking CSK to the ultimate along with his fast innings. Dhoni’s resolution raises the query of whether or not he would retire from IPL after this season? Dhoni is thought for his stunning selections and the reply to this query is sort of troublesome.
[ad_2]
Source link
