[ad_1]
Karad: Maharashtra State Electrical energy Distribution Firm Ltd (MSEDCL) staff throughout a protest towards its proposed privatisation, in Karad, Maharashtra, Wednesday, Jan 4, 2023.
| Picture Credit score: PTI
The staff’ union of the Maharashtra State Electrical energy Distribution Firm Ltd (MSEDCL), who had referred to as a three-day strike starting Tuesday midnight, introduced the withdrawal of their strike on Thursday a lot to the aid of customers.
The strike was referred to as off after representatives of the three state-owned energy firms – the Maharashtra State Electrical energy Distribution Co. Ltd (Mahavitaran), the Maharashtra State Electrical energy Transmission Co. Ltd. (Mahapareshan) and Maharashtra State Electrical energy Technology Co Ltd (Mahanirmiti) – together with these of 32 worker unions had an extended assembly with Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis on the state residence ‘Varsha’ in Mumbai.
A significant demand of the protestors was that the Maharashtra Electrical energy Regulatory Fee (MERC) not challenge a ‘parallel distribution licence’ to the Adani Group’s energy subsidiary, which is reportedly looking for a licence for energy distribution in Mumbai’s Bhandup Zone.
Following the assembly, Mr. Fadnavis, assured the unions of three state-owned energy firms that the State authorities had no intention to denationalise these firms.
“Quite the opposite, over the following three years the Maharashtra authorities will make an funding of Rs. 50,000 crore in several belongings in these three firms… We’ve got no intention of doing in Maharashtra what Delhi and Odisha have achieved with their state-owned electrical energy firms,” mentioned Mr. Fadnavis, talking to reporters after the assembly.
Stating that the discussions with the union representatives had been “constructive” and that the federal government had accepted a lot of the calls for, Mr. Fadnavis mentioned that the prime cause for the strike was the problem of parallel licencing.
“A non-public firm has moved an software earlier than the MERC requesting a licence. The unions wished us [the State government] to contest this as they had been frightened about profitability of the State-owned firms and a cascading impact that might occur if a licence was granted to a non-public participant. I assured them that we are going to contest this,” mentioned the Deputy CM, including that henceforth all efforts can be made to shut the “communication hole” between the unions and the federal government which had compelled the unions to strike.
Adani Electrical energy Navi Mumbai Restricted, a subsidiary of Adani Transmission, had utilized to the Maharashtra Electrical energy Regulatory Fee (MERC) for a parallel licence for energy distribution underneath the jurisdiction of Mahavitaran in Bhandup, Mulund, Thane, Navi Mumbai, Panvel, Taloja and Uran areas.
Earlier than the results of the assembly, the strike, which commenced within the wee hours itself, hit a number of rural pockets and industrial zones throughout the State with 9 districts – together with Pune Rural and elements of Vidarbha area – being badly-affected, mentioned sources.
The State authorities had invoked the Maharashtra Important Companies Upkeep Act (MESMA), at the same time as protests remained peaceable.
[ad_2]
Source link
