[ad_1]
The Speaker mentioned Ponmudy’s membership has been restored within the state meeting.(PTI)
The state Legislative Meeting Speaker M Appavu reinstated Ponmudy, who will proceed as a member of the Legislative Meeting
Disqualified Tamil Nadu minister and DMK chief Okay Ponmudy has been reinstated days after the Supreme Court docket stayed his conviction and three-year jail sentence in a disproportionate asset case.
The case towards the minister and his spouse was registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) in 2011. Ponmudy was then the Minister for Increased Training and Mines within the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) regime from 2006 to 2011.
The state Legislative Meeting Speaker M Appavu reinstated Ponmudy, who will proceed as a member of the Legislative Meeting (MLA). The Speaker mentioned Ponmudy’s membership has been restored within the state meeting. Furthermore, Chief Minister MK Stalin wrote to the Governor asking for Mr Ponmudy’s oath-taking as a minister right now or tomorrow.
In the meantime, Justice N Anand Venkatesh of the Madras Excessive Court docket has scheduled the ultimate listening to of a suo motu revision filed towards the acquittal of former Tamil Nadu Minister Okay Ponmudy in a disproportionate property case (completely different from the one heard by the Supreme Court docket yesterday) from April 15 to 19, 2024.
Following Mr. Ponmudy’s disqualification, Minister of Backward Lessons Welfare RS Rajakannappan assumed duty for greater training. If a courtroom finds members of the legislatures responsible, they’re legally barred from serving in parliament or the meeting.
Mr. Ponmudy’s tenure as a minister and MLA ended shortly after his conviction in December 2023. The claimed disproportionate property grievance was filed by the DMK’s rival AIADMK in 2011, the yr it defeated the DMK.
THE PROSECUTION’S CASE
In accordance with the prosecution, the accused have been charged with accumulating Rs 1.79 crore in wealth that was disproportionate to their documented revenue sources from April 13, 2006 to March 31, 2010. The couple confronted authorized motion for his or her incapability to offer a passable rationalization for this discrepancy.
It was the DVAC’s case that as of April 13, 2006, Ponmudy and his spouse possessed pecuniary sources and properties valued at roughly Rs 2.71 crore, marking the graduation of the scrutiny interval. By the conclusion of the examination on March 31, 2010, the couple was discovered holding pecuniary sources and properties amounting to Rs 6.27 crore.
The company contended that Ponmudy, as a public servant, violated the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, particularly beneath Sections 13(2) learn with 13(1)(e). Moreover, his spouse was accused of abetting and aiding him in acquiring and holding pecuniary sources and properties on his behalf.
In 2016, a particular courtroom in Villupuram acquitted the duo. Particular choose for Prevention of Anti-Corruption Act Instances T Sundaramoorthy had handed the order.
[ad_2]
Source link
