Chief minister (CM) Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu on Friday sought the early decision of Himachal Pradesh’s long-pending calls for, together with the state’s share in Chandigarh, BBMB dues and points in regards to the Shanan Hydroelectric Undertaking, throughout a gathering with Punjab governor and Chandigarh administrator Gulab Chand Kataria.
Calling on Kataria in Chandigarh, Sukhu reiterated Himachal Pradesh’ declare to its 7.19% share within the Union Territory of Chandigarh below the provisions of Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966. Sukhu stated Himachal Pradesh is a successor state to the erstwhile Punjab and is entitled to its due share based mostly on the inhabitants ratio of the areas transferred to the state.
The chief minister additionally sought the allotment of 4.736 acres of land in Sector 52, Chandigarh, for establishing a further Himachal Sadan, saying that the latest Himachal Bhawan is now not sufficient to accommodate the growing variety of college students, sufferers and different guests from state.
The CM additionally sought intervention for the settlement of long-pending dues associated to the Bhakra Beas Administration Board (BBMB). “Supreme Courtroom had recognised Himachal Pradesh’s entitlement to a 7.19% share in BBMB tasks and related advantages. State has been awaiting realisation of its entitlement to 13,066 million items of energy and the related monetary dues for over a decade,” he stated.
Sukhu additionally raised the problem of Himachal’s professional declare over the Shanan Hydroelectic mission in Mandi, sustaining that the the 99-year lease to Punjab expired on March 2, 2024, and any declare to its continued operation or possession lacks authorized foundation.
“Erstwhile Mandi state was by no means part of the composite state of Punjab. Somewhat, it acceded to and merged with the Union of India in 1948. Thereafter, Himachal Pradesh was constituted as a Half ‘C’ State in 1951 and was subsequently declared a Union Territory with impact from November 1, 1956. The Shanan Hydroelectric Undertaking is positioned in a area that was by no means included throughout the “transferred territories” as outlined below Part 2(n) of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966,” he stated.
Consequently, the provisions of the stated Act don’t have any applicability to the realm by which the mission is located, nor can any rights over the mission be derived thereunder, he added.
Sukhu expressed confidence that the pending points could possibly be resolved by means of constructive dialogue, mutual respect and the spirit of cooperative federalism.
