Former minister and Kunda MLA Raghuraj Pratap Singh bought a significant aid from particular CBI court docket in Lucknow on Saturday within the 2013 homicide case of the then CO Zia-ul-Haq because the court docket accepted closing report filed by CBI after a recent investigation and rejected a plea for additional prosecution in opposition to him, holding there isn’t any stable floor to proceed in opposition to him and ordered closure of the case.
On March 2, 2013, DSP Zia-ul-Haq, posted as Kunda CO in Pratapgarh district, was killed by a mob in Balipur village.
The court docket additionally ordered closure of the proceedings in opposition to different named accused Gulshan Yadav, Hariom Srivastava, Guddu Singh and Rohit Singh. Pratibha Singh, particular judicial Justice of the Peace, CBI, handed the order after accepting the ultimate report submitted by the central investigating company within the court docket.
“The ultimate report submitted by the CBI in RC No. 4(S) 2013, Case No. 21/13, Police Station Hathigawan, Pratapgarh (complainant being Smt. Parveen Azad) is accepted. As there isn’t any ample floor for continuing additional on this matter in opposition to the named accused Raghuraj Pratap Singh alias Raja Bhaiya, Gulshan Yadav, Hariom Srivastava, Guddu Singh and Rohit Singh, proceedings in opposition to them are terminated,” the court docket mentioned.
“After completely analysing all the fabric accessible on report, perusing the closure report, knowledgeable opinion and paperwork, the court docket reaches the conclusion that the additional investigation carried out by the CBI satisfies this court docket and there’s no ample power within the arguments raised within the protest petition filed by the complainant,” the court docket added.
“There isn’t any such proof accessible on report on the idea of which the court docket can take cognizance of offence in opposition to the named accused. No documentary or oral proof has been produced by the complainant additionally to indicate that the named accused within the current case have been concerned within the incident,” the court docket noticed. “Subsequently, the closure report introduced earlier than this court docket is accepted,” the CBI court docket mentioned.
