Two days after Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove delivered a sermon urging congregants to vote towards Zohran Mamdani, rabbis throughout the nation had been requested to signal a letter quoting him.
By the point it was printed Wednesday, 650 rabbis and cantors had completed so, including their names calling out the “political normalization” of anti-Zionism amongst figures like Mamdani, the New York Metropolis mayoral frontrunner.
By Friday, the letter had greater than 1,000 signatories, making it one of many most-signed rabbinic letters in U.S. historical past.
However Cosgrove, the senior rabbi of Park Avenue Synagogue on the Higher East Aspect, was not one in all them.
“As a coverage, I don’t signal group letters,” he mentioned in an interview.
“My worry of such letters is they’ll flatten topics and scale back advanced points to ‘Who’s on a letter and who’s not on a letter?’” he added. “There are different platforms that rabbis can provide expression to their management.”
Because the letter has ricocheted throughout the nation and escaped from rabbis’ inboxes to their congregants’ social media feeds, it has ignited a wave of scrutiny, plaudits and recriminations. Some folks have voiced reduction or disappointment in seeing their rabbi’s identify on the listing — or on not seeing it.
“Jewish communities are circulating spreadsheets of who signed and who didn’t,” wrote Rabbi Shira Koch Epstein in an essay describing what she mentioned was “a painful public reckoning” going down each publicly and privately.
“I’m not sleeping. These pink strains are so harmful,” responded Rabbi Lauren Grabelle Hermann, of Manhattan’s Society for the Development of Judaism, in one in all dozens of feedback representing a variety of views. Hermann devoted her Yom Kippur sermon earlier this month to calling on her neighborhood to “turn into an antidote to the polarization and fragmentation in our broader Jewish neighborhood and society.”
Now, dealing with renewed strain from their congregants over the letter, some New York Metropolis rabbis are articulating different methods for responding to a political second that many Jews are experiencing as fraught and high-stakes.
Rabbi Angela Buchdahl wrote to all members of Central Synagogue, the Manhattan Reform congregation the place she is senior rabbi, to clarify why they’d not discover her among the many letter’s signatories.
“As a Central clergy crew, we’ve spoken from the pulpit in a number of previous sermons and can proceed to take a transparent, unambiguous place on antisemitism, on anti-Zionist rhetoric, and on sharing our deep assist for Israel,” she wrote.
However, citing the significance of “separation of church and state,” Buchdahl wrote that “it’s as much as every of us to vote our conscience.”
“There are political organizations, together with Jewish ones, the place electoral politics is the core mission. Get entangled,” she wrote. “Central Synagogue, nevertheless, is a Jewish non secular residence and we wish to hold it that method. It stays our conviction that political endorsements of candidates are usually not in the most effective curiosity of our congregation, neighborhood, or nation.”
Rabbi Jeremy Kalmanofsky of the Conservative synagogue Congregation Ansche Chesed on the Higher West Aspect despatched out a letter of his personal to congregants. He mentioned he wouldn’t be voting for Mamdani however didn’t imagine it was his position to inform them tips on how to vote. And he raised issues about what he mentioned was the “shearing off of liberal from conservative liberal communities,” saying that Jews of all political outlooks ought to be capable to pray and act collectively.
“The Torah instructions lo titgodedu, historically interpreted to imply, don’t fragment yourselves into factions,” Kalmanofsky wrote. “I worry this occurring to Jews. Frankly, I worry it greater than I worry an anti-Zionist mayor.”
Rabbi Adam Mintz, who leads the not too long ago rebranded Fashionable Orthodox congregation Shtiebel @ JCC, mentioned he’d signed a smaller letter from Manhattan Orthodox rabbis urging the significance of voting. However Mintz felt this letter was exterior his position.
“I’m a rabbi. I don’t wish to take a political stand,” he mentioned. “I perceive that some folks really feel strongly and so they wish to take a political stand. I believe that’s OK, however that’s not my position.”
Rabbi Michelle Dardashti of Kane Road Synagogue, an egalitarian Conservative synagogue in Brooklyn, didn’t signal the letter, both. She as a substitute took a unique method to addressing her congregants within the lead-up to the election, internet hosting about 80 of them Tuesday evening for a night of dialogue.
Members representing a spectrum of views took turns sharing questions and issues forward of the election. Dardashti mentioned congregants, regardless of conflicting views, had been “deeply engaged and passionate, and spoke fantastically and respectfully.”
“I perceive my rabbinic position to be one which creates house for folks to study from one another’s totally different experiences, and due to this fact views,” she mentioned.
Some Jewish leaders and teams outright opposed the letter and its message, quite than contemplating it an ill-advised technique. Bend the Arc, a progressive Jewish group that endorsed Mamdani, launched an announcement excoriating the letter and its signatories for distracting from what it mentioned was the true challenge: Donald Trump.
“These Jewish leaders are doing Trump and the MAGA motion’s work for them: dividing our pro-democracy motion at a time after we should be united to beat again fascism,” the assertion learn.
Josh Whinston, a rabbi in Ann Arbor, Michigan, expressed skepticism on social media in regards to the letter’s origin and intentions, and famous that he didn’t signal it.
“This was not a name for ethical readability; it was a political transfer geared toward influencing a neighborhood race in New York Metropolis,” he wrote.
Upon first studying it, Whinston wrote that he “agreed with components of what it mentioned,” and that he “thought of signing.” However, hoping to study extra in regards to the Jewish Majority, the group behind the letter, Whinston wrote, “The positioning provided no substance. There was no mission, no imaginative and prescient, no management, no workers.”
The Jewish Majority’s objective, as acknowledged on its web site, is to counterbalance left-wing “fringe teams” like Jewish Voice for Peace and Jews for Racial and Financial Justice, which they are saying “weaponize the Jewish identification of a few of their members to name for coverage suggestions which can be rejected by the overwhelming majority of the Jewish neighborhood.”
The chief director of the Jewish Majority, Jonathan Schulman, is a former longtime AIPAC staffer. In an interview, Schulman mentioned he wrote the letter’s first draft earlier than it underwent rounds of edits from about 40 rabbis of various denominations.
The inspiration got here when “Rabbi Cosgrove’s sermon began making the rounds,” he mentioned, including, “By Sunday morning, rabbis had been reaching out to me saying, ‘That is the sort of sentiment we’re feeling all around the nation.’”
In contrast to Cosgrove’s sermon, which included an endorsement of Andrew Cuomo, the letter doesn’t point out both of Mamdani’s opponents. It does, nevertheless, say that political figures like “Zohran Mamdani refuse to sentence violent slogans, deny Israel’s legitimacy, and accuse the Jewish state of genocide,” and calls on Individuals to “get up for candidates who reject antisemitic and anti-Zionist rhetoric, and who affirm Israel’s proper to exist in peace and safety.”
Schulman recalled being informed, “‘There’s the problem of Zohran Mamdani and calls to globalize the intifada and all this, however there’s anti-Zionist candidates operating for mayor in Somerville, Massachusetts, in Minneapolis, Seattle — that is changing into normalized, that is changing into mainstream.’”
Rabbi Mark Miller of Temple Beth El in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, is among the rabbis who helped edit the letter. He mentioned a part of his objective was to assist make clear its nature as being nationwide quite than native.
“This was not an try for the remainder of us to become involved in New York politics,” Miller mentioned. “It’s highlighting it, however the challenge is that all over the place we are, this can be a concern.”
Signatories on the letter embrace rabbis from throughout america, and even exterior the nation.
Rabbi Brigitte Rosenberg, the senior rabbi of a Reform congregation in St. Louis, signed the letter, and mentioned the message about anti-Zionism resonated together with her on a nationwide degree.
“Mamdani was the large race that was talked about on this, nevertheless it’s come up in different races, proper?” Rosenberg mentioned, pointing to the comeback bid of “Squad” member Cori Bush to symbolize St. Louis in Congress.
Rabbi Jeremy Barras from Miami mentioned quite a few his congregants have residences in New York, and “they’re simply terrified.”
“However I might’ve signed it if it was the identical challenge in any metropolis in America,” Barras mentioned. “It simply occurs to be true that we’re a bit extra delicate as a result of so lots of our households have connections in New York.”
Each Barras and Rosenberg mentioned they couldn’t bear in mind an open letter signed by this many rabbis. There have in actual fact been examples of open letters being signed by 1,000-plus rabbis, together with an enchantment to open Palestine to Jews in 1945; a 2017 letter calling on Trump to assist refugees and a letter from earlier this yr demanding Israel cease “utilizing hunger as a weapon of warfare.”
Yehuda Kurtzer, co-president of the Shalom Hartman Institute, affirmed that open letters just like the one distributed by the Jewish Majority are nothing new, and mentioned there may be “positively a stress that emerges” for these anticipated to signal. Endorsements from the pulpit, alternatively, are “new terrain,” he mentioned, noting the Trump administration’s determination to cease enforcement of an IRS rule barring political endorsements from non secular establishments.
“We felt fairly strongly that rabbis shouldn’t usually do that, and there’s an entire number of causes,” Kurtzer mentioned. “It’s a believable state of affairs that politicians will begin doing quid professional quos with non secular leaders round their wants. When you do it as soon as there’s an expectation that you simply’ll do it on a regular basis.”
Among the rabbis who signed say they weren’t making a partisan political assertion. Ammiel Hirsch, senior rabbi of Stephen Sensible Free Synagogue on the Higher West Aspect and the chief of a Zionist group throughout the Reform motion, acknowledged “worries” about alienating some congregants. However, like others who’ve come out towards Mamdani, Hirsch mentioned it was non-partisan to talk out towards somebody whose rhetoric may compromise Jewish security.
“There’s all the time the danger that individuals will perceive you in a partisan method, particularly since we’re residing in such a hyper-partisan environment now,” Hirsch mentioned. “Nevertheless it’s a danger that we’ve to take as a result of the stakes are so excessive.”
Rabbi Joshua Davidson of Manhattan’s Temple Emanu-El made an identical level. “I’m not going to inform individuals who they must vote for. However I do assume it’s necessary for me to allow them to know what I assume they must be excited about after they vote,” he mentioned, pointing to points like “the well-being of the State of Israel and the security of the Jewish neighborhood.”
For Cosgrove, whose synagogue is positioned 20 blocks from Davidson’s, the division that’s arisen since his sermon is one thing to grieve.
“It deeply saddens me that, in a second the place the Jewish neighborhood needs to be excited about the exterior threats that our neighborhood faces, that we needs to be spending an iota of vitality on that which exacerbates any fault strains,” Cosgrove mentioned.
Maintain Jewish Tales in Focus.
JTA has documented Jewish historical past in real-time for over a century. Maintain our journalism robust by becoming a member of us in supporting impartial, award-winning reporting.
