Residents, nonetheless, strongly objected. They asserted that the temple just isn’t an unauthorized construction however was constructed by the JDA itself years in the past together with the adjoining park. Even the boundary wall, they claimed, was constructed by the authority’s personal company. Calling the identical construction an encroachment now, they argued, was “fully unjustified” and “insensitive.”
Native residents stated that issuing such a discover to a non secular website hurts public sentiments and that the administration ought to act with higher warning and empathy.
As protests intensified within the space, the Chief Minister’s Workplace (CMO) intervened, reviewing preliminary info and ordering the suspension of the enforcement officer, holding him accountable for the controversy.
In its assertion, the CMO stated the officer’s conduct mirrored “severe and deliberate negligence” in authorities work and confirmed a transparent “departure from anticipated administrative habits,” indicating arbitrariness.
In the meantime, officers in JDA’s enforcement wing maintained that the motion was a part of compliance with Excessive Courtroom instructions arising from a pending petition. The Deputy Commissioner of Zone 7, tasked with surveying buildings alongside Gandhi Path for the widening mission, reportedly discovered that the temple’s boundary wall intruded into the proposed highway width and listed it as encroachment.
The incident has triggered sharp public reactions, elevating questions on administrative discretion, sensitivity towards non secular buildings, and accountability inside authorities businesses.
