- Election Fee states an extra declaration was briefly added.
Congress has stepped up its assault on Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alleging that he “illegally and unilaterally” modified Kind 6 to assist the BJP. Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Jairam Ramesh made the allegations amid a Supreme Court docket listening to on the voter registration kind, after the courtroom stated it had not authorised any modification to Kind 6 and would study the official document to ascertain who made the adjustments.
Congress Alleges ‘unlawful’ Kind 6 Adjustments
Rahul Gandhi, reposting his October 1 publish on X, stated it was now “established past doubt” that Kumar had modified Kind 6 illegally and unilaterally. He alleged that the CEC had abused his place and stated that everybody concerned could be held accountable.
It’s now established past doubt that Gyanesh Kumar modified Kind 6 illegally and unilaterally. This is only one extra proof of him abusing his place to assist the BJP. He and everybody else concerned on this felony assault on our democracy might be held accountable. https://t.co/a33eJdPetu
— Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) October 5, 2026
Congress common secretary Jairam Ramesh individually alleged that the CEC had “lied” and intentionally modified Kind 6 to allow the deletion of Gen Z voters’ names. He additionally claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was “deeply afraid” of younger voters.
SC Seeks File On Kind 6
The Congress remarks got here after the Supreme Court docket questioned adjustments to Kind 6 throughout a listening to on petitions regarding the Election Fee.
Chief Justice Surya Kant stated the courtroom had not authorised any change to Kind 6 and that it could study the official document to find out who had made the modification. The courtroom additionally issued discover to the Centre and the Election Fee.
The Kind 6 subject was raised by petitioner Shailendra Mani Tripathi, represented by senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy. She alleged that new voters in Delhi had been being requested to supply extra data whereas making use of for inclusion within the electoral roll.
The Supreme Court docket has not, nonetheless, dominated that the Kind 6 adjustments had been unlawful or that the CEC acted unlawfully.
Additionally Learn: ‘How Was Kind 6 Modified With out SC Approval?’: Abhijit Dipke Questions CEC Amid SIR Row
What Is Kind 6?
Kind 6 is utilized by eligible residents to use for inclusion of their names within the electoral roll as new voters.
Opposition events have alleged that the shape was altered throughout the Particular Intensive Revision (SIR) course of. They’ve pointed to an extra declaration requiring new candidates to ascertain a hyperlink with their very own, or their mother and father’ or grandparents’ earlier SIR information.
The Election Fee has rejected the suggestion that Kind 6 itself was modified. It has stated an extra declaration kind was connected to Kind 6 particularly for the SIR train.
Based on the EC, the declaration is proscribed to the SIR course of. As soon as the train concludes, Kind 6 will proceed to be stuffed in its current format, permitting new voters to use for inclusion within the electoral roll as earlier than.
Additionally Learn: ‘We Did Not Approve Modified Kind 6’: CJI Surya Kant’s Key Comment Amid CEC Gyanesh Kumar Row
